Back to Blog
Draw InspectionsLendersConstruction Loans

Self-Inspection Draws vs. Third-Party Inspections

ByRAZE Team
•October 19, 2026•6 min read
Self-Inspection Draws vs. Third-Party Inspections

A borrower sends twelve photos of new drywall and asks for the draw by Friday. The lender has to decide whether those photos are enough to fund, or whether the draw waits for an inspector to visit the site.

Both answers can be right. A self-inspection draw and a third-party draw inspection are tools for different draws, and one lending program can use both. This guide covers how to decide which draw gets which, the rule to write before the first one, and how to keep both on one record. Each lender sets its own policy; nothing here replaces it.

Two ways to verify the same draw

In a self-inspection draw, the borrower or builder captures the evidence and the lender's team reviews it. In a third-party inspection, someone independent of the request visits the site and reports what is in place. The first trades some independence for speed and cost; the second costs a visit and buys an independent observer. Live video with a reviewer directing the camera, often called a remote draw inspection, sits between the two.

The choice matters because a construction loan's collateral is built one draw at a time. The NCUA's examiner guide notes that the full value of the collateral does not exist when the loan is granted; it is created as the improvements go in. The same guide lists the risks a lender monitors along the way, among them inappropriate use of loan proceeds, failure to complete, failure to build to specifications and cost overruns. Every draw should rest on evidence that the work it pays for is really there.

Bank examiners look at the people behind that evidence as well. The FDIC's construction lending examination procedures ask whether the individuals conducting inspections are qualified, whether they are rotated or independent of the lending function, and whether spot checks are made of the inspectors' work. A self-capture program has to answer the same questions in its own terms.

When each one fits

SizeSelf-capture often fitsSmall relative to the loan, where a visit costs more than the risk it controlsA third-party inspection usually fitsLarge draws, where an error moves real money
StageSelf-capture often fitsInterior finish, cosmetic rehab and other work that photographs clearlyA third-party inspection usually fitsThe first draw, the final draw and any work about to be covered
MaterialsSelf-capture often fitsInstalled work onlyA third-party inspection usually fitsStored materials, where quantity, location and condition all count
BorrowerSelf-capture often fitsAn experienced borrower with clean prior drawsA third-party inspection usually fitsA new borrower, or any draw after an exception or a missed milestone
EvidenceSelf-capture often fitsPhotos that match every budget line in the requestA third-party inspection usually fitsMissing views, a mismatch with the budget, or a question about the property itself

Read the table as a starting point, not a rule. A small draw for stored lumber still needs someone to count it, and a large draw for paint on a long-time borrower's project may not. The lender's credit policy decides; the table only shows where the evidence tends to hold up. For how often to inspect at all, see construction loan inspection frequency.

Write the rule before the first draw

  1. Name the loans that qualify

    Set the programs, draw sizes and borrower history that may use self-capture. A borrower who asks to inspect their own draw gets a straight answer from the policy, not a judgment call.

  2. Set the evidence standard

    List the required views for each budget line, require capture inside an app with date and time stamps and location data, and name the person responsible for each submission. See draw inspection photo requirements.

  3. Fix the on-site checkpoints

    Decide in advance which draws always get a visit: the first draw, work about to be covered, stored materials and the final draw.

  4. Define the escalation triggers

    Photos that do not support the request, a missed milestone, a change order or an exception send the next draw to an independent inspector. When an inspection shows less work lists the lender's usual options.

  5. Spot-check the program

    Send an independent inspector to a sample of self-capture draws. The same logic the FDIC applies to inspectors applies here: someone checks the person who checks the work.

  6. Keep one record

    Store every submission, review decision and escalation in the loan file, in the same format as the site visits, so the history reads as one program.

The question is not who holds the camera.

It is who ordered the inspection, what it had to show, who reviewed it and where the record lives. A program that answers those four can use either path for the right draw.

Where RAZE fits

In RAZE, self-capture is a fulfillment choice inside the lender's workflow, not a substitute for one. The lender's team orders every inspection in the Ordering Engine and sets the required questions and photos. For self-capture, the lender sends a Direct Request to the borrower or general contractor, who completes it in the RAZE Mobile App. For a third-party inspection, the order goes to a background-checked RAZE Marketplace inspector, or to the lender's own inspector through Direct Request.

Every path produces the same report. Photos carry GPS coordinates, date and time stamps and the device behind them, and they link to the draw sheet line items they support. When a self-capture draw trips an escalation trigger, the next order goes to an inspector without leaving the loan's record. The result is a file built to support audit and exam review, whichever path each draw took.

Third-party inspections through RAZE are priced on the RAZE Rate Card: a flat $125 per single-family inspection when RAZE sends the inspector, or $25 per request with your own inspector, at any U.S. address. See the RAZE Rate Card. RAZE documents the work; the lender reviews every report and decides what it supports. More on the full workflow: RAZE draw inspections and the draw inspection FAQs.

Frequently asked questions

Examiners review the lender's program, not a single method. The FDIC's construction lending procedures consider whether inspectors are qualified, rotated or independent of the lending function, and spot-checked, so a lender using borrower-captured evidence should be able to show where it is allowed, what it must include and when a site visit takes over.

Move it when the photos do not support the request, when a milestone is missed, when stored materials or soon-to-be-covered work are in the draw, or after any exception on the loan. Write those triggers into the policy so the switch is automatic rather than negotiated.

The lender's draw team reviews it. The team compares the submission with the budget and the request, then funds it, asks for more evidence or orders a site visit. The borrower or builder supplies the evidence; the decision stays with the lender.

Keep reading

One standard for every draw

Self-capture and site visits arrive in the same report, under the same required questions and photos.

For Lenders

See a Direct Request and a Marketplace inspection side by side on a project in your book.

Request a Demo

The workflow

How RAZE orders, captures and reports residential draw inspections.

See the draw inspection workflow

Who holds the camera matters less than the rule.Write the rule before the first draw.