Answer Hub · Process & timing
Can a builder dispute a draw inspection report?
- Reviewed by
- Reviewed by RAZE
- Last reviewed
Short answer
Yes. A builder or borrower disputes a draw inspection report through the lender, not the inspector, and supplies evidence: dated photos, invoices, delivery tickets or an approved change order. The lender decides whether the evidence is enough, whether to order a re-inspection and what to fund. The original report and any correction stay on the record.
Why the dispute goes through the lender.
The inspector reports to the lender, not to the builder. That independence is the point of the inspection: the FDIC's construction and land development examination procedures ask whether inspectors are independent of the lending function and whether their reports are detailed enough to support disbursements. A builder who calls the inspector to change a percentage puts that independence in question, so most lenders route every disagreement through the loan officer or draw administrator.
What makes a dispute succeed.
Many disputes come down to timing or evidence: work finished after the visit, materials delivered the next day, a room the inspector could not access, or a change order that moved work between budget lines. The disputes that move a lender are specific:
- name the draw sheet line and the percentage you believe the work supports;
- send dated photos of that work and, for materials, invoices and delivery tickets;
- attach the approved change order if the budget changed;
- offer site access for a re-inspection.
A general complaint that the inspector was too strict rarely changes a decision. Line-by-line evidence does.
What the lender can do.
The lender may accept the added documentation, ask the inspector to clarify or correct the report, order a re-inspection, or fund what the original report supports and carry the rest to the next draw. See what happens when a draw inspection shows less work than requested. The loan agreement governs the decision and any re-inspection fee.
Why it matters for lenders.
A written dispute path protects both sides. Builders get a fair hearing, and the lender keeps a file that shows why it funded what it funded. FDIC research on multiple-draw construction loans found that negative inspection reports are associated with a higher likelihood that banks deny draw requests, so the report and the dispute record often decide real money. Keep the original report, the dispute, the evidence and the outcome together.
How RAZE handles it.
RAZE documents; the lender decides. Every photo in a RAZE report carries GPS coordinates and date and time stamps, and photos link to the draw sheet line items they support, so a disputed line can be checked against its own evidence. When a lender's reviewer needs more, rejecting the inspection returns it to the inspector with the reviewer's reason attached, and the full status history stays on the record. RAZE does not approve, deny or fund draws.
Sources
Primary sources only. Where a figure appears on this page, it comes from one of these.
- 1.Construction and Land Development Lending (Core Analysis Procedures, 10/25)FDIC · fdic.gov
- 2.Heitz, Martin and Ufier, Bank Monitoring with On-Site Inspections (CFR Working Paper 2022-09)FDIC Center for Financial Research · 2022 · fdic.gov
- 3.Unsupported construction draw FAQs (challenging a report, reinspection)RAZE
See the workflow behind the answer.
RAZE standardizes how draw inspections are ordered, dispatched, captured and delivered, inside the loan administration workflow a lender already runs.
Request a Demo